Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A310 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A310 is 1956 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 19% better in Sea of Thieves than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 107 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - CA$144.4 vs CA$177.54
- Up to 31% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - CA$1.35 vs CA$1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 30 vs 35 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
107
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$144.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$144.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
90
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.97/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$177.54
81%
Buy for CA$177.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
69%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
69%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |