The GeForce RTX 4090 D is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 D
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 75 vs 425 Watts
GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Dec 28th, 2023
Average FPS
217
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
24%
Min 1% FPS
23
16%
Price, CA$
CA$352.24
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.77/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Dec 28th, 2023
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1149 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
73.54 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
4%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4090 D | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Dec 28th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
$1,599.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
425 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
24 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6X | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
1010 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
443.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
1149 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
73.54 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |