The GeForce RTX 3090 is a much faster gaming GPU than the Arc A770, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's CA$1518.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 16 GB
Advantages of the Arc A770
- Up to 76% cheaper – CA$479.99 vs CA$1998.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 225 vs 350 Watts
GeForce RTX 3090 vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1998
24%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.33/FPS
30%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
79%
Min 1% FPS
75
76%
Price, CA$
CA$479.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.74/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$479.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$494.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$499.81
In Stock
GeForce RTX 3090 vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 3090 vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 3090 vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
62%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
90%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
55%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
55%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 3090 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$1,499.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
350 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
24 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR6X | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
936.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
189.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
556 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
35.58 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |