The GeForce MX450 25W is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX450 25W
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 25 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX450 25W
Aug 15th, 2020
Average FPS
51
70%
Min 1% FPS
22
59%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388.06
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.31/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$388.06
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$531.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$439.90
In Stock
GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX450 25W vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX450 25W
Aug 15th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
48%
Pixel Fillrate
29.76 GPixel/s
63%
Texture Fillrate
52.08 GTexel/s
49%
FP32
1.667 TFLOPS
25%
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX450 25W | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 2nd, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179.00 |
| GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
| 80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 168 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 29.76 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 47.04 GPixel/s |
| 52.08 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.8 GTexel/s |
| 1.667 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS |
