In Battlefield 6, the GeForce MX350 is much slower than the Radeon RX 6700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 20 vs 230 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Up to 7600% faster in Battlefield 6 – 77 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 7600% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 21 days newer – Mar 03, 2021 vs Feb 10, 2020
- Is 1 year and 21 days newer
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
77 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$789
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.24/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
15%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
1.1994 TFLOPS
9%
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX350 Feb 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6700 XT Mar 3rd, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Released | Mar 3rd, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $479.00 |
| GeForce MX (3xx) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
