In Battlefield 6, the GeForce MX330 is much slower than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 97% less energy – 10 vs 300 Watts
- Consumes up to 97% less energy
Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Up to 10400% faster in Battlefield 6 – 105 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 10400% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 months and 17 days newer – Oct 28, 2020 vs Feb 10, 2020
- Is 8 months and 17 days newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce MX330 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2259.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$21.52/FPS
100%
![ASRock AMD Radeon RX6900XT Graphics Board GDDR6 16GB [Domestic Authorized Dealer] RX RX 6900 XT PG D 16G OC](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/gpus/B08QYQH7QW.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX330 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX330 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX330
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
25.5 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
38.26 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
1.2242 TFLOPS
5%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX330 Feb 10th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT Oct 28th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 10th, 2020 | Released | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
| GeForce MX (3xx) | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
10 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
