In Battlefield 6, the GeForce MX110 is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce MX110
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 30 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 4100% faster in Battlefield 6 – 42 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 4100% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Feb 22, 2019 vs Nov 17, 2017
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce MX110 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
42 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
31 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce MX110 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce MX110 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce MX110
Nov 17th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
40.1 GB/s
14%
Pixel Fillrate
8.048 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
16.1 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
515.1 GFLOPS
9%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce MX110 Nov 17th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Feb 22nd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2017 | Released | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce MX (1xx) | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
