The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
The Radeon RX 590 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
70%
Min 1% FPS
23
62%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
74%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
33%
FP32
0%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
