The GeForce GTX 960 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 120 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
44%
Min 1% FPS
25
35%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
124
100%
Min 1% FPS
72
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1359.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.96/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,359.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,310.11
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,299.95
In Stock
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 6700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
18%
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 3rd, 2021 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $479.00 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
37.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.2 GPixel/s |
75.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 413 GTexel/s |
2.413 TFLOPS | FP32 | 13.21 TFLOPS |