Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1342 days newer than GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 950 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 75 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 4 vs 2 GB
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$231.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$231.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
61%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 950 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 20th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$159 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
105.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1024 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1188 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1653 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |