Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms GeForce GTX 765M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 is 3400 days newer than GeForce GTX 765M.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 765M
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 - 75 vs 450 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4090
- Performs up to 137% better in Forza Horizon 4 than GeForce GTX 765M - 348 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 24 vs 2 GB
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 20th, 2022
FPS
348
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$5922.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$5,922.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7473 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 20th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
13.81 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
55.23 GTexel/s
4%
Desktop • Sep 20th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 765M | vs | GeForce RTX 4090 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2022 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6X |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s |
797 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2235 MHz |
863 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2520 MHz |
1002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1313 MHz |