The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 150 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Aug 16th, 2012
Average FPS
50
33%
Min 1% FPS
22
24%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Average FPS
152
100%
Min 1% FPS
92
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1039.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.84/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,039.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Aug 16th, 2012
Memory
2 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
27.44 GPixel/s
17%
Texture Fillrate
109.8 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
2.634 TFLOPS
9%
GeForce RTX 4070
Apr 12th, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 16th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 12th, 2023 |
$299.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 200 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
27.44 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 158.4 GPixel/s |
109.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 455.4 GTexel/s |
2.634 TFLOPS | FP32 | 29.15 TFLOPS |