The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 460. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti
The Radeon RX 460 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 460
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 75 vs 110 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon RX 460 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Oct 9th, 2012
Average FPS
45
88%
Min 1% FPS
18
82%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Average FPS
51
100%
Min 1% FPS
22
100%
Price, CA$
CA$333.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.53/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon RX 460 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon RX 460 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon RX 460 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Oct 9th, 2012
Memory
1 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
77%
Pixel Fillrate
14.85 GPixel/s
77%
Texture Fillrate
59.39 GTexel/s
88%
FP32
1.425 TFLOPS
66%
Radeon RX 460
Aug 8th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.15 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 650 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 460 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 9th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
$149.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Arctic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
110 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
14.85 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.2 GPixel/s |
59.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 67.2 GTexel/s |
1.425 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.15 TFLOPS |