The GeForce GTX 1660 is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's CA$2026.84 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660
- Up to 81% cheaper – CA$473.16 vs CA$2500.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660
Mar 14th, 2019
Average FPS
77
89%
Min 1% FPS
40
85%
Price, CA$
CA$473.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.14/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2500
18%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$28.73/FPS
21%
GeForce GTX 1660 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660
Mar 14th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
192.1 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
80%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
61%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
$219.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 85.68 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 157.1 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
| 5.027 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |
