The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090, however, it's a better value for money, as it's CA$1520.16 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 76% cheaper – CA$477.84 vs CA$1998.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 120 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
51%
Min 1% FPS
44
44%
Price, CA$
CA$477.84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.75/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1998
23%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.33/FPS
47%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
31%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
15%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |