The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is better in every way
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
88%
Min 1% FPS
32
84%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
90%
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
85%
FP32
4.101 TFLOPS
85%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
95%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
64.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
128.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
4.101 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |