Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 5700 XT is 114 days older than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon RX 5700 XT - CA$5.50 vs CA$23.10 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT - 125 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 106 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER - 8 vs 6 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
FPS
84
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$462.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$462.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$23.1/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$2448.63
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,448.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 29th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
52%
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | vs | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi |
$229 | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
336 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1605 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1905 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |