Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6800 XT is 554 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 15% better value when playing Starfield than Radeon RX 6800 XT - CA$22.66 vs CA$26.80 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT - 75 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Performs up to 173% better in Starfield than GeForce GTX 1650 - 60 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
22
37%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$22.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$498.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$498.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$26.8/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$1608.06
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,608.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
14%
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi II |
$149 | MSRP | $649 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |