The GeForce GTX 1650 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 75 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
65%
Min 1% FPS
31
57%
Price, CA$
CA$727.5
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.36/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$727.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$498.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
44%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
34%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 93.24 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
