The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is better in every way
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
61
100%
Min 1% FPS
29
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
85%
Min 1% FPS
23
79%
Price, CA$
CA$350.29
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.73/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Apr 2nd, 2020
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
2.458 TFLOPS
94%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
70%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $99.00 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
50 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
38.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
| 76.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
| 2.458 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
