Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 2368 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than Radeon R7 240 - 105 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 30 vs 50 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R7 240
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $69 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |
