Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 1033 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 16% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 80 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 35 vs 50 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
69
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$203.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$203.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
51%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |