The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's CA$2149.71 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 86% cheaper – CA$350.29 vs CA$2500.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 75 vs 180 Watts
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2500
14%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$28.73/FPS
23%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
60%
Min 1% FPS
23
49%
Price, CA$
CA$350.29
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.73/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
32%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
256.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
107.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
255.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
8.186 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
