The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- A faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is better in every way
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
96%
Min 1% FPS
23
92%
Price, CA$
CA$352.24
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.77/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
76%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
49%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $99.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 75 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
