Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3702 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield IV than GeForce GTS 250 - 190 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 75 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$235.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7527 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTS 250 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |