The GeForce GT 540M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 540M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
80%
Min 1% FPS
14
67%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, CA$
CA$205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.18/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 540M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 540M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
30%
Pixel Fillrate
2.688 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
10.75 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
258 GFLOPS
16%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 540M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.688 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| 10.75 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| 258 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
