The GeForce GT 520 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 29 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 1 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GT 520 vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Average FPS
39
98%
Min 1% FPS
14
93%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Average FPS
40
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, CA$
CA$212.96
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.32/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 520 vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520 vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520 vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520
Apr 13th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
78%
Texture Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
155.5 GFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
64%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
25%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 13th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $59.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
29 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.62 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
6.48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
155.5 GFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
