Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 4717 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 23 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 533% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GT 425M - 57 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 8 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
57
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$669.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$669.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7647 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 425M | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 400M | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |