In Battlefield 6, the GeForce GT 240 is much slower than the Radeon RX 580 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $34 cheaper!
GeForce GT 240
- Up to 28% cheaper – $89.02 vs $122.99
- Up to 28% cheaper
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 69 vs 185 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Radeon RX 580
- Up to 3400% faster in Battlefield 6 – 35 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 3400% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Apr 18, 2017 vs Nov 17, 2009
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 96% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.51 vs $89.02/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in Battlefield 6
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 580: Comparison of performance and price
GeForce GT 240
Nov 17th, 2009
Average FPS
1 FPS
3%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
4%
Price, $
$89.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$89.02/FPS
4%
Radeon RX 580
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
35 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
26 FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.99
72%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 580: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon RX 580: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 240
Nov 17th, 2009
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
54.4 GB/s
21%
Pixel Fillrate
4.4 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
17.6 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
257.3 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX 580
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
42.88 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
193 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.175 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 240 Nov 17th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 580 Apr 18th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2009 | Released | Apr 18th, 2017 |
$80.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Polaris (RX 500) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
69 W | Power Consumption | 185 W |
