In Battlefield 6, the GeForce 840M is much slower than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 840M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 33 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 4100% faster in Battlefield 6 – 42 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 4100% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Feb 22, 2019 vs Mar 12, 2014
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
42 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
31 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 840M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 840M
Mar 12th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
16.02 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
8.992 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
17.98 GTexel/s
11%
FP32
863.2 GFLOPS
16%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 840M Mar 12th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Feb 22nd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 12th, 2014 | Released | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
