The Arc A770 is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A770
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 225 vs 285 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
70%
Min 1% FPS
75
66%
Price, CA$
CA$479.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.74/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$479.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$494.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$499.81
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A770 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
76%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
89%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
45%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
82%
Texture Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
44.1 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
225 W | Power Consumption | 285 W |
Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
307.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 250.6 GPixel/s |
614.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 689 GTexel/s |
19.66 TFLOPS | FP32 | 44.1 TFLOPS |