The Arc A370M is at least much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Average FPS
63
72%
Min 1% FPS
31
66%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2500
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$28.73/FPS
100%
Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
61%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
51%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
51%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
| 131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
| 4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |
