Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Arc A350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1132 days older than Arc A350M.
Advantages of Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 25 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 9% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Arc A350M - 394 vs 363 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A350M - 6 vs 4 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
394
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 30th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
Arc A350M | vs | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1150 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |