Key Differences
In short — Arc A350M outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A350M is 4552 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of Arc A350M
- Performs up to 31% better in Death Stranding than GeForce 210 - 80 vs 61 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 25 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
61
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$222.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$222.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 541 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 30th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Arc A350M | vs | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1150 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |