Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Vega 3 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 47 days newer than Radeon Vega 3 Mobile.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 15 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 3100% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Radeon Vega 3 Mobile - 32 vs 1 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
32
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$22.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$734.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$734.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Integrated • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 6th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
4.004 GPixel/s
4%
Texel Fillrate
12.01 GTexel/s
7%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Mobile | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Picasso | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 6 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Bus | 192-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1001 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |