Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2603 days older than Arc A310.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield 1 than Arc A310 - 104 vs 85 FPS
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 30 vs 175 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
85
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$649 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |