Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2337 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon Pro W6400 - 72 vs 64 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
64
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$344.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$344.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
43%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$649 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR6 |
4096-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |