Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R9 M395X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1409 days newer than Radeon R9 M395X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 75 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Radeon R9 M395X - 64 vs 53 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
58%
GeForce GTX 1660
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 14th, 2019 |
| Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $219 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.1 GB/s |
| 723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |
