Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Radeon R9 M395X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 1662 days newer than Radeon R9 M395X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 75 vs 100 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 27% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R9 M395X - 57 vs 45 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
67%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| 723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1725 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
