Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Radeon R9 290 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for CA$316.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 184 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for CA$316.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 184 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 290 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1935 days newer than Radeon R9 290.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

  • Performs up to 25% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon R9 290 - 111 vs 89 FPS
  • Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 120 vs 275 Watts
  • Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 6 vs 4 GB
This is a free version of No Man's Sky.
No Man's Sky

No Man's Sky

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 290 Logo
Radeon R9 290

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013


FPS

89

80%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


FPS

111

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$2.85/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$316.16

100%

FPS and Value Winner

ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy for CA$316.16 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 184 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Radeon R9 290 Logo
Radeon R9 290

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019

Theoretical Performance

AMD Radeon R9 290 Logo
Radeon R9 290

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013


Pixel Fillrate

60.61 GPixel/s

71%

Texel Fillrate

151.5 GTexel/s

89%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

84.96 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

169.9 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon R9 290 Logo

AMD Radeon R9 290

vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nov 5th, 2013Release Date
Feb 22nd, 2019
Volcanic IslandsGenerationGeForce 16
$399MSRP
$279
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOutputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinPower Connectors1x 8-pin
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4 GBMemory
6 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR6
512-bitBus192-bit
320 GB/s
Bandwidth288 GB/s
947 MHzBase Clock Speed
1500 MHz
Not AvailableBoost Clock Speed1770 MHz
1250 MHzMemory Clock Speed
1500 MHz

Builds Using Radeon R9 290 or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.