Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1170 days older than GeForce GT 1030.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GT 1030 - 32 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 - 3 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 30 vs 200 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
FPS
28
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • May 17th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
23.49 GPixel/s
78%
Texel Fillrate
35.23 GTexel/s
33%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | May 17th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$279 | MSRP | $79 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1228 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1468 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |