Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 3291 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 115 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 209% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon R7 260X - 105 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 8 vs 2 GB
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$413.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
6.547619047619048%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
11.458333333333332%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Alchemist |
$139 | MSRP | $289 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |