Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1630 is 3112 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 - 55 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Performs up to 26% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250E - 43 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 4 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
GeForce GTX 1630
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1630
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250E | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
| $109 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 72 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 800 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
