Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1963 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 152% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon R7 250 - 68 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 6 vs 1 GB
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
68
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |