Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 660 outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 660 is 397 days older than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 30 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Performs up to 23% better in Sons Of The Forest than Radeon R7 240 - 27 vs 22 FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
22
81.48148148148148%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$67.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
5.6 GPixel/s
27.131782945736433%
Texel Fillrate
14 GTexel/s
16.95736434108527%
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 240 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2012 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 600 |
$69 | MSRP | $229 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
73.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s |
650 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 980 MHz |
700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1032 MHz |
1150 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1502 MHz |