Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 5100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 826 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Up to 18% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - CA$488.81 vs CA$597.32
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 75 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 113% better in Control than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 64 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 43% better value when playing Control than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - CA$9.33 vs CA$16.29 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
FPS
30
46%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$16.29/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$488.81
100%
Buy for CA$488.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
64
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$597.32
81%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$597.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
71%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$499 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
713 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1086 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |