Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 1623 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.
Advantages of AMD Radeon PRO W7500
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 70 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 6% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7500 - CA$595.0 vs CA$633.8
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for CA$633.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74452 minutes ago
Buy for CA$595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74453 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
78.08823529411765%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
89.23319327731093%
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$429 | MSRP | $279 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1344 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |