Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W5700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 1058 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro W5700.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 205 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 57% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro W5700 - 55 vs 35 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Radeon Pro W5700 - CA$329.99 vs CA$372.42
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro W5700 - CA$6.0 vs CA$10.64 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
FPS
35
63%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.64/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$372.42
88%
Buy for CA$372.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
55
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
50%
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Alchemist |
$799 | MSRP | $289 |
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1400 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1880 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |