Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 479 days older than Radeon Pro 5600M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Radeon Pro 5600M - 141 vs 132 FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
141
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
86%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
92%
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jun 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR6 |
2048-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
394.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
822 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1144 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
770 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |