Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5600M outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5600M is 2442 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Performs up to 22% better in New World than Radeon R7 260X - 79 vs 65 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 50 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 8 vs 2 GB
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Radeon Pro 5600M
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro 5600M
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
24.037148320131113%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
33.66120218579235%
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
Jun 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 2048-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
394.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| 822 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
| 1144 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 770 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |
